Social Security Reform.....

We, the American people, have, before us, and put upon us, a most dishonorable crime. I say crime because if a private citizen were to to do it they would go to jail. The crime I'm talking about is Social Security. It is,in its essence, unethical. A state where the government seizes funds out of ALL of its citizens earnings.

I say dishonor for the obvious reasons and the not so obvious. I say not so obvious because as it turns out, they've {politicans] been spending the money they stole from their constiuents {you & me}and said they were/are 'holding' it for us until we reached the {"retirement"} age.

Upon reaching that age they told/tell us they would re-distribute our money back to us divisely for the existing life of our remaining funds. Oh and they also lie and tell us that our employers "match" the "contribution" {6.2%} that we see subtracted from our checks under the B.S. term, FICA.

Well, I guess "technically" it's not a lie, you see, your employer does match your "contribution" but he matches it with YOUR MONEY!!!!! Your employer takes that 6.2% out of your check before you see a drop of ink on your check much less a penny of the money that, the government & your employer STOLE from you! In all fairness your employer has to do this becuase he'll go to jail if he doesn't. So now, we find ourselves in a crisis. The Social Security account is fast depleting.

It's 2005 now, we're roughly, 35 years away from Social Security depletion. So in 35 years, it'll all be gone, but in 35 years there will be millions of people dependant on Social Security and there will be millions more that will look forward to depending on it. They will depend on it because they have been seeing where they have been involuntarily paying it for their whole working lives. But guess what? It'll be gone. It should be there, but its not, sorry, they spent it ALL!

What to do, what to do? Well ole' G.W. has a pretty GREAT IDEA THAT WE MUST SUPPORT! Privatize accounts for younger workers. It's still unfair as hell because it's only 4% but its a start! And it's a helluva lot better than allowing politicians to continue to plunder our hard-earned funds for their own political use and political projects, whcih they prioritze by how many votes they can get out of it, kinda like political insurance. So here's the deal with the reform proposal...

Bush is proposing to allow "younger" workers the ability to open private accounts and pay themselves the money that currently goes directly to government under the pretense of Social Security. Upon their {government} seizure of said monies, they afford themselves pre-eminent power over our money. Simply, this means that everybody thinks the money is somehow coming back to them when they reach "retirement" age, we tend to think that the money is being kept somewhere, waiting to be reclaimed by {us} its owner, we think it's kinda like a savings account. Of course you assume, also, that any remaining monies in your Social Security account will go to those persons you desire to leave that money to, you know, your family! Oh how wrong you were/are, this is not something that automatically happens. The government decides weather members of your family should get YOUR money after YOU die! Let me repeat...

What happens to your money when you die is not up to you!

Your Social Security benefits are an average percentage of the money you made over most of your working lifetime. There are five major categories your Social Security is used for; retirement, disability, family benefits, survivors, Medicare. With that said there are conditions and "certain" contingencies that have to be met in order for the government to actually pay the money out. The following is a brief description of those contingencies. www.irs.gov/faqs/faq-kw212.html

The bold words are my interruptive commentary, giving you a better idea of what I mean. Injustice, reigns strong and long in our current system, this is just a taste...

Retirement
Benefits are payable at full retirement age -an age we get together and decided on, (with reduced benefits available as early as age 62 ) for anyone with enough Social Security credits - what does "enough Social Security credits" mean? You telling me that people who pay the Social Security tax aren't automatically guaranteed to receive Social Security Benefits?-. The full retirement age is 65 for persons born before 1938. The age gradually rises until it reaches 67 for persons born in 1960 or later. Can you believe this @#*&?

Disability
Benefits can be paid to people at any age who have enough Social Security credits -there we go again, with "enough Social Security benefits"- and who have a severe physical or mental impairment that is expected to prevent them from doing "substantial" work for a year or more or who have a condition that is expected to result in death. Generally, earnings of $800 or more per month are considered substantial. "800 or more per month," how many people fall {will fall} into that category?

Family Benefits
If you are eligible for retirement or disability benefits, -you meet the requirements decided and set by us- other members of your family might receive benefits too -my point here is obvious, notice they used the word MIGHT even though you pay Social Security taxes, your family's security remains precarious, as it is not up to you which persons of your family MAY or may not receive benefits from your money. These include: your spouse if he or she is at least 62 years old - again the government decides how old your spouse has to be to receive your benefits- or under 62 but caring for a child under age 16; and your children if they are unmarried and under age 18, under 19 but still in school or 18 or older but disabled.-hope your kids fall into one of these categories if you are expecting the government to fork over your money to them-

Survivors
When you die, certain members or your family may be eligible for benefits if you earned enough Social Security credits while you were working -of course there is no guarantee that your survivors will actually receive benefits from the money that you earned, but if they do turn out to be eligible, there are only "certain" family members who the government decided your money should go to-. here's where they'll tell you which members of your family are entitled to your money,- The family members include: a widow(er) age 60 or older, 50 or older if disabled or any age if caring for a child under age 16; your children if they are unmarried and under age 18, under 19 but still in school or 18 or older but disabled; and your parents if you were their primary means of support - I hope those persons you want to leave your money to, fall into one of these categories-. A special one-time payment of $255 may be made to your spouse or minor children when you die -gee, thanks, you guys-.

Another little tidbit you may want to know regarding the age of retirement; the government can decide without reason or provocation to delay the retirement age. This is an idea that has been thrown around as a resolution to a foreseen economic crunch caused by Social Security. And make no mistake, their hope, is that, in delaying the retirement age you will die before you reach that age. Thereby, unburdenoning the government, of it's debt to you. If after reading this sentence you are one who is thinking, "wont the money go to my family," please read the preceding passages again! It is imperative that we understand and control government's role in our lives and limit it, not the other way around.

Bush's proposal is for people to own the account that their money will go into and decide for themselves what they want to do with their own money, decide for themselves, how old they should be before they start spending their own money, decide for themselves, which family members they want to leave their money to and certainly decide for themselves how old a family member has to be to receive benefits and so forth. Any opposition to this reform is an open attempt to denagrate the idea of freedom and individuality. Check out the opposers of this reform and then see which party they belong to, you might notice a trend.

We, as a free thinking society, should have the foresight to identify instances when our liberties are being dishonored and our intelligence insulted and we should fight and support anything that will further a free society for our children and grandchildren to enjoy and preserve the ideas of personal Liberties, of which we all have a right.

"Give Me Liberty, Or Give Me Death"

Hip Hip Hooray, Condi Was Confirmed Today!

She's in. Condoleeza Rice is offically the new Secretary of State, oh I know yall hate it. Hate to see the first Black-Woman Secretary of State to arise during the Bush Administration. Well attention All "African Americans." This is a great moment in history for us, particularly. We should be, without any restraint whatsoever support this woman. She should be revered by us. She should be held on the pedestal she deserves. And to top it all off it's looking as if she is the one who is though of when entertaining the idea of the first Black President. I have so much to say that I have to spend a bit of time thinking before I really talk to yall about Condi.

Here's How Their Spending our Money

Okay, Boys and Girls, Here's why you definetly don't want these guys to stay in control of your money. After reading this, you'll have the good sense to want them as far away from your money as possible after you discover how they spend, {OUR MONEY!} This is one of those "just so you KNOW" type columns.

Congress released the annual Fiscal Report Omnibus “Appropriations” Bill, advising us {the American People} of how they collectively decided to spend the money they took from us in taxes, their yearly budget. The decisions are motivated by what they consider to serve the “nation’s best interests”. This year {fiscal} the bill totaled 388 billion the Senate passed the bill on November 20, 65-30 the House later passed it with a 344-51 vote. Obviously, there is a great deal of information but, if I may, I’d like to touch on a few of the specific entities and causes considered by Congress as necessary for “the benefit of the nation.

Well we can start with the $100,000 they allocated for Punxsutawney Philadelphia. The hundred grand is for a “weather museum.” Why, you ask, would they spend that much on a “weather museum?” Well, there’s a perfectly reasonable explanation for this, you see Punxsutawney Philadelphi, is the home of the hokey Groundhog Day star, Punxsutawney Phil. Did you know Groundhog day is America's second favorite holiday? I bet you're breathing a sigh of relief now, I bet knowing that, completely disparges your initial reaction, when you thought they had wasted your money! I'm sure you feel much better now!For details on this “national” treasure, Puxsutawney Phil, you can visit http://tiffanyanthony.blogspot.com/2004/11/www.PunxsutawneyPhil.comand/or if you want to stay abreast of the exciting happenings of “America’s second favorite holiday” check out http://tiffanyanthony.blogspot.com/2004/11/www.groundhogday.org Politicians, you gotta love em’! We should definitely put these geniuses back in office, wouldn’t you say?

Oh! It gets better, how bout the $25,000 they “appropriated” for the study of Mariachi Music for Las Vegas Schools! Can you believe this! Hey, I’m just releasing a sigh of relief that Congress had the fortitude and wisdom to acknowledge the doom and peril our nation will surely face if we don’t get on top of this Mariachi Situation. Phew, we really dodged a bullet there! I'll bet you are all breathing yet another sigh of relief because, again, I bet you thought they had wasted your money!

How about the $20,000,000 {yes, I meant to put that many zeros, $20 million dollars} for the Presidio Trust to transform an old army base into a national park. Presidio Trust is a “trust” set up by the government for the “preservation” community to dispense, {at their own unchecked discretion} our hard earned money on various environmental issues. Well sure! Certainly, the HUNDREDS http://tiffanyanthony.blogspot.com/2004/11/www.nps.govof national parks we already have in this country are insufficient. The park is to be built in Terminatorland (California}, a state that already boasts 9 national parks.I'll let you figure out how “transforming” an army base into a national park would hardly fall under the natural category. You will definetly sleep better now, I'll bet, knowing that we are going to get on top of this "lack of enough National Parks" issue, you were probably really worried about it!

Then there’s the $400,000 for the Charity Cultural Services Center to initiate a {get ready for this}: “Skills for Life Program for Asian Immigrants.” What exactly are “skills for life’? And I am I the only one who doesn’t remember us being involved in the decision-making process any Asian Immigrants underwent when they decided to come to this country? That said, how does the responsibility fall on the American people to equip Asian [or any] Immigrants with the “skills” they will need for “life” in this country.

Our politicians are in the nasty habit of preying on the ignominy of the very people who put them into positions of power{the fatuous masses}. They rely on our reliance in them. This erroneously placed trust they enjoy, provides them the luxury of never being called to account for their open, self- propagation. The following is an example of what I mean:

Nancy Pelosi {the dollbaby she is} D-CA, House minority leader, said, “This omnibus spending bill is unwieldy, not reflective of the aspirations and needs of the American people.”

She’s right about that, although I’m not sure if the $591,000 she got for the International Women’s Museum is very reflective of the “aspirations and needs of the American people,” either. Pelosi continued her disturbing display of intellectual idiocy stating, “the Bush administration is systematically dismantling protections for our national parks and forests” {remember the $20 MILLION for the Presidio Trust} Even if you don't like the guy {G.W.}, I think we could all agree that this woman is a delusional, disaster, who wastes our money on "protecting" parks and forests instead of protecting the people in this country.

How is it, that this woman is a Senator!? Note: Pelosi, actually is reflective of the rampant, self-serving, idiology of our current politicians. Most of them squander the money they steal from us. Look for yourself and see which party the idiots tend to belong to.

Yes, it’s the unadulterated, cold, hard, truth of how politicians abuse the power, We, The People, give to them {with our votes} by wasting 388 billion dollars that belong to us, the American people. The same people who continue to put them in power.This and all information on this page can be found at: www.heritage.org/Research/Government, At, http://www.visi.com/you can find and stay abreast of issues that come before Congress and you can also see who “represents” you in Congress. You will be interested to know what decisions were made by your “representative” on your behalf in your local community. Fascinating stuff!

George Bush Gives Us Up To The United Nations!

While, I'm not a Republican, George Bush has always been my main man when it comes to his role as U.S. President. I didn't agree with all his opinions, ideas and decisions, however, I have adjudicated his character to be one that is deserving of deference & admiration.

I felt this way for different reasons. One being, his position on the war. I thought he proved himself to be a focused leader with knowledge and understanding as to the obligations, the job of President/Commander in Chief calls for. He has had to make very hard decisions, facing an unimaginable, Godless enemy {terrorists}. Under the burdenal shroud of the first successful attack on this country since Pearl Harbor>>Nine Eleven. And should we even mention the pure, open and constant attacks on every aspect of the man's character. The collective contempt held for the guy is downright un-nerving. The grace in which he handles it all is another reason for my affinity for our 43rd President, he seems rises above it all.

But today, well today, he really pissed me off. Why {?} well, today he decided to abandon those admirable principles that enamored me so.

Tsunami in Southeast Asia, terrible, terrible thing, like something out of MGM's latest Blockbuster.

Movie- terrible, like it was'nt real, like maybe really, really good sepcial effects. How does one wrap their mind around the unthinkable. You know how we expect our movies to evoke nightmarish, ghoulish characters, we expect them to chronicle fantastic human suffrage, unimaginable stuff, usually. Did you see "The Day After Tomorrow?" The point being that what happened in Southeast Asia is so terrible, it has reached beyond our finite understanding and entered the world of the infinite. The movie-like events, that we don't really think will ever happened, not because we are unfamiliar with terrific terribleness and suffrage, but because some thing are so terrible, , the severity of the horror is not even something that our minds would even consider. It was an infinite event, an unimaginable terribleness.

The world's collective reaction: Send aid {what else could they do, even Sadaam might have sent a couple million} and of course, twist the {natural} disaster and seize it as an opportunity to lie, assault and steal from American the American people.

EVERYONE as I'm sure most of you have heard has used this unthinkable event to continue the rampant, slanderous, verbal assaults on this country.

We have been called "stingy" in a variety of ways, and, sadly, it's not just the international America-hating world it's those wonderful, patriotic guys and girls here right in our country, Americans, themselves, slam us and lie about us all because they don't like Bush.

I'm angry @ G.W. not because of any kind of "stinginess" I mean why would I dislike him based on a lie. I do like to consider myself a thinking person after all. But let me just proxy you with a few facts about this country and our issues with "stinginess"

Along with the $400 million our government gave, the UNITED STATES' citizens {we, the greedy, evil, selfish, fat, cheeseburger-loving, Chevy & Dodge truck driving, despicable Americans}gave;

- private contributions - $ 200 million
-Catholic relief spices {this is a website that offers monetary and voluntary relief to those who need it} received $100,000 per hour!
- American Red Cross- $ 100 million with constant incoming donations.

And that's just the money from private citizens! Yeah, the world's and our co-patriot's criticisms, did I say "criticisms"? I meant "lies" about this and the people of this country.

Would stats like those be adduced as "stingy" by even the most flagrant idiot?

here's the "little" else we {America!] are doing and giving;

-ships carrying food supplies
-aircraft carriers
-helicopters
-transport planes
-logistical support
-sending disaster assistance teams
-sending supplies & advance teams to Sumantra's Northwest coast
-sending water purification system to Sri Lanka

There you have it folks. A itemized round up of jus how "stingy" Americans are.

Now back to G.W. and his assault against us. He has decided to grant sovereignty to the crooked, America-hating, wouldn't support us against Sadaam, thieving, punks of the United Nations. Kofi Anaan, the general Secretary {the head guy} if the United Nations, demanded that the United Nations be given full power of distributing aid to the tsunami Relief effort.

I absolutely do not agree with the United Nations having control of the world's pooled money intended to aid those in need.

Why I dont agree?

Because of the $64 B-I-L-L-I-O-N they S-T-O-L-E from the Women and Children of Iraq. We cannot forget the egregious "Oil For Food" program, where Kofi Anaan and The United Nations, let me say it again, STOLE $64 BILLION DOLLARS FROM THE IRAQI PEOPLE. WE HAVE GOTTEN NOWHERE IN MAKING IN REAL HEADWAY WITH THAT MESS, BUT ONE THING WE DO KNOW; KOFI ANAAN'S SON WAS A PLAYER AND PERSONALLY BENEFITED PROFUSELY! Oh but of course Kofi {as he has stated} didn't and doesn't know anything about that, right? Right

So, Bush, who refused to put our country's security by NOT turning over the decision to invade Iraq to them {lest we not forget that these are the pedastaled, few for which we should have passed their "global test" before acting militarily}

But he turns around and gives our money over to them! Well actually, more, of our money {you did know that our tax dollars are also allocated to these people? You did know, without the United States, the United Nations could not exist effectually!}

So now, they are handling all money intended for tsunami relief. I just hope they actually give the money to the people this time. Damn, I thought of you as never backing down, standing up for your beliefs and values in the face of opposition but now, I just don't know what to make out of this, it absolutely infuriates me. G.W. What the hell are you thinking? I know Condi couldnt've told you to do this, Did she?

Naw, she's way too brilliant and pragmatic, I'm not convinced I could survive such a heartbreak from Condi.

Is It Just Me?

Or have plain talk and direct truth just completely gone out of style. We are so obsessed with being politically correct and not "offending" anyone that we no longer deal in truth. Our ideas about political correctiveness are totally disconnected to reality. We are a country filled with people from ALL OVER THE WORLD, OF COURSE SOMEONE IS GOING TO GET OFFENDED!

Let me give you an example, I'm listening to Neal Boortz, he's a radio-talk show host, and he's telling his audience how at their office {radio station} they recycle and they have the recycle bins, and they really take it seriously around there. So he goes on to say that there was an issue because one of the recycle bins was labeled "colored paper" this was interpreted to have a racial connotation thereby making it "offensive" because of Black Americans once being know as "colored" in this country! So now because of that unfortunate period in our history the word "colored" is off limits.

You can't even breathe in this country without "offending" someone. In order to get things done and make changes in our lives and our country so that we may continue to evolve, move forward, we must be honest and direct. We have different problems these days, times have evolved, our people have evolved, our problems have evolved and therefore, we should evolve. How can we have or come up with any solutions, when we haven't clearly identified our problems because we refuse to be honest with one another because somebody might get offended! W all need to get over ourselves because life in itself is offensive. We are all pelleted with offenses from the day we are born till the day we die. Life is not perfect and neither are people, we're fooling ourselves if we think we can reach the truth without being truthful.

Just a little mental release from me, I've nothing more to add.

Oh no! I hope I didn't offend anyone.

The Despicable Michael Jackson And Those Who Praise Him

Isn't it great that we not only live in a country that allows adults to have sex with children and go unpunished but also allows children to regularly stream through the home of a child molester/rapist, admittedly it's an alleged accusation although, that 20 million dollar settlement he paid that other little boy who said that, he too, had a sexual relationship with this cretin, doesn't suggest that this is an "alleged" incident. By the way, the "alleged" part of this argument holds no place of relevance in my argument, as {one of} my heros, Anne Coulter {former us-constitutional lawyer} explained, "innocent until proven guilty, just means you don't go to jail first." It does'nt mean we should act as if these children are lying and that Micahel Jackson didn't really do these things.

What does it say about a society that will overlook such horrible transgrssions just because the man in question can sing and dance really good?

Here we have a grown man who is obviously not, mentally sound, who is unable to let his childhood go and grow up, for a myriad of reasons. He openly professes and often speaks about his love and need to BE Peter Pan! He turns his California estate into an amusement park {which he named "Neverland" you know, home of Peter Pan and Tinkerbell etc..} and we won't even get started on what he's done to his appearance, despite these obvious, red-flag warning signs, our society continues to subject children to this madman. Children{!} the very people who should be protected from this a-hole because the children are the ones who are in danger of him. He clearly has issues that render him unfit to be with children, period.

This, to me, is a no brainer.

So can someone please tell me, no, make me understand why we keep shipping kids out to "Neverland". Jackson's spokeswoman, Raymone K. Bain, said that civic groups and charities bring kids to the ranch at least three times a month! This is preposterous and indicative of why millions upon millions of children are sexually molested or assaulted in this country. Their perpetrators, doing it again and again and again, going unpunished, usually. In order for our justice system to appropriately punish those gulity of child rapists/molesters, they have to kill the child in the process of their sexual attack upon them. The child has to die or suffer insurmountable conditions in order for his/her assailant to suffer true consequences for what they have done!

How many of you would let your kids hang out with this guy? What if he wasn't Michael Jackson, just some weird- looking guy who behaves the way he does and is accused of the things he's accused of? Would children still be allowed around him?

Santa Barbara County authorities have charged Jackson with molesting a boy, conspiracy and administering an intoxicating agent to a minor.

Actually, now that I re-reflect on what he's being charged with I must change my strong opinion on the safety and well being of our children being compromised by exposing them to this man. No, based on reading his charges again, I have decided that I am the ridiculous one, we should not air on the side of paranoia when it comes to our kid's safety, let's give him the "benefit of the doubt." It is I, who have the problem, not society.

Yes, you, society, are right! He is Michael Jackson after all, you folks should absolutely continue to take our children to his house!

Peterson Gets Off The Hook With "Death Penalty" Sentence

Scott Peterson gets the death penalty, in California of all places, a state that already has over 600 people on Death Row, 641 to be exact, all waiting to be executed. Guess how many prisoners have been executed in California in the last 14 years? 10. Yes, I meant ten. That liberal led, pro-life {as it relates to death row, not abortion} cess pool have only gotten around to honoring our justice system and the jurisprudence of our jurors & judges only ten times in the last 14 years! Get in line Scott. On average, they execute about one-third of a person every year.

You know the thing that really bothers me, well there are a couple of things that really bother me, but let me first say this, SCOTT PETERSON SHOULD BE IN GENERAL POPULATION WHILE IN PRISON,BECAUSE, AS ANY IDIOT CAN DEDUCE, BASED ON THE AFOREMENTIONED FACTS, SCOTT PETERSON WILL NOT BE EXECUTED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, HE'LL PROBABLY DIE OF OLD AGE!

The essential idea of prison is taking one's freedom as a punishment for breaking the laws of the land. However, we all know that in the American penal system, when a person goes to prison, they not only have their freedom taken away but there exists, an added danger, punishment, stressor of surviving the sexual and violent inclinations of other inmates. Scott, as we can all see, is quite the looker, a real ladies man or as would be the case in prison, a man's man. Being on Death Row enables Peterson to escape the affectionate, {for lack of a better word} venerable, favorable treatment of those guys serving double life sentences and so forth in the dark, damp, celled, dungeons of California’s own, San Quentin penitentiary.

Oh you know, the collective shower parties {the guys are especially helpful to a fella who drops his soap} or maybe Scott would have preferred a little communal, get together in the broom closet where he could enjoy focused initiation rites administered by big, burly, tattooed fellows who truly embrace the idea of "personal involvement" when helping the new guys get used to life on the Inside.

You know, I'll bet they had special plans for a guy whose in there for killing his pregnant wife and baby and then dumping them into the ocean. What do you think?

But oh no, they won't get that chance because Scotty-boy will be hanging out on Death Row where he will enjoy solitude and sadly, safety. He will not have his life, which will not imminently end, made to be a living hell, so long as he is alive. He should have to suffer and sitting alone in a cell does not cut it! The punishment absolutely does not fit the crime, but what’s new? He's on Death Row in California wasting tax-payers’ money {it costs us more to imprison a person on death row than it does us, to imprison a person in general population because of delays & appeals } and he will be there for at least, many years and will evetually, probably die there, from natural causes however, not execution!

He'll get to spend those long years safely, thinking of what he's done and eventually making peace with it and he'll probably become starkly religious accepting Jesus as his savior and all that, you know how folks do when they go to prison, he'll make peace with what he has done. Not having to look over his shoulder, he'll eat his meals in peace instead of having to endure the social interactions with fellow inmates in the mess hall, he will go un-plagued by such circumstances. Circumstances, that are inclusive in one's punishment when he/she goes to prison in this country. Now that's a true injustice to all of humanity. Scott Peterson, spawn of satan, is authentic, bona-fide, real-deal, pretty- boy, Ted Bundy-like scum.

Oh and I would also like to cite how the media and his attorneys used his mama and her bad health as one of their reasons to plea for his life. Sickenly, during the sentencing hearing, there, presented to the jury were the various faces of Scott Peterson; Scott, the baby; Scott, the boy; Scott, the good son; Scott, the All-American boy. The poor condition of his Mother's health was added to the stockpile of compost used as a viable reason to spare his life. Not blown away? Okay, I'll say it like so, HIS MOTHER'S HEALTH CONDITION IS COMPLETELY, UNDUBIOUSLY, IRRELEVANT TO HIS KILLING HIS PREGNANT WIFE AND BABY {did you know he cut her arms off?} REGARDING THE HEALTH CONDITION OF HIS MOTHER {whom I'm sure is a lovely woman} OR ANYONE ELSE IN HIS FAMILY; WHO THE CARES!? SO WHAT, THANKS FOR SHARING! NOW CAN WE GET ON WITH THE BUSINESS OF THE DAY AND KILL THIS SUB-HUMAN? THANK YOU!


Scott Peterson is among the most heinous of us and should be treated accordingly. When a person is sentenced to death, they should immediately be taken before a firing squad {or maybe we should stone them to death [it's gotta be unbearably, painful] or something like that, those theocracies aren't all bad} and executed immediately, the death penalty should mean death.

If not, he should be made to endure prison on the same terms that everyone else has to endure prison. Death Row inmates should not be coddled and humored, by being afforded shelter from the chaos and dramatics of prison life in this country!